3 ms·
I've known union workers who love it and I've known union workers who didn't. Both are common enough to be impossible to generalize from beyond opinions being a
by Kalium 8y ago
I've known union workers who love it and I've known union workers who didn't. Both are common enough to be impossible to generalize from beyond opinions being as diverse as people.
Anyone who says "there's no hierarchy" is, without exception, wrong. All they actually mean is "there is no explicit hierarchy". There's always an implicit one. The big difference between the two is generally accountability - explicit hierarchies can have it structured in. Implicit hierarchies get to say "We're all just workers here!" to dodge accountability.
> And I think you'll agree that the trajectory we're currently on is grim. Think it over.
You're right. I do agree. That said, I also grew up in a place where short-sighted unions helped turn a thriving industrial area into a post-industrial wasteland.
Just because one course is grim doesn't mean I want to trade it for any other course.
- anarchodev 8y agoThe whole reason this thread exists at all is because the explicit hierarchy you have so much faith in is not working, and never really has. I'd love to see an example of a union using their structural philosophy as an excuse to evade accountability. Don't suspect you had one in mind?