3 ms·
If you have evidence debunking the number of studies and expert opinions I've posted I'd love to see it. The evidence supporting your opinion has been debunked
by okmokmz 7y ago
If you have evidence debunking the number of studies and expert opinions I've posted I'd love to see it. The evidence supporting your opinion has been debunked and called out in other studies and by experts in the field as I've demonstrated. Feel free to stick by what you believe, but you know what they say about opinions... Interestingly the studies that support your opinion came to false and misleading conclusions due to bias as well as weak and inconsistent data, much like the comments supporting your opinion
- coldtea 7y ago>If you have evidence debunking the number of studies and expert opinions I've posted I'd love to see it. First of all, how is the burden on proof on me? The causal link is the official APA position, the "number of studies and expert opinions" you've posted is not it. >The evidence supporting your opinion has been debunked and called out in other studies and by experts in the field as I've demonstrated. Oh the irony. Do you just pick the experts you agree with over the official body's position? A number of experts also objects for climate change being man-made -- in fact you can find a number of experts objecting to almost everything established. Second of all, my point was not that the causal link is true (which would made the argumentation relevant) but that considering it is not at all "absurd" -- as the parent commenter (you?) insisted, and in fact it's seriously studied.