3 ms·
Because it's a very a CPU-intensive task? It's all relative, but in 2003 JS was one of the worst languages you could possibly use for that. Of course it's moot
by _bxg1 8y ago
Because it's a very a CPU-intensive task? It's all relative, but in 2003 JS was one of the worst languages you could possibly use for that. Of course it's moot if they aren't actually planning to use it for that side of things.
- semicolon_storm 8y agoSpeed can vary from interpreter to interpreter. I haven't seen any benchmarks of this interpreter, so we don't know how fast it may be. Maybe their JS interpreter applies some restrictions to the language that greatly speeds it up?
- mathgladiator 8y agoOr has special primitives for CPU intensive tasks.