> Even the greediest capitalist executives imaginable would not take a gamble on there being a second wave of problems with that plane. Well I guess the downvo

> Even the greediest capitalist executives imaginable would not take a gamble on there being a second wave of problems with that plane. Well I guess the downvotes happened because this statement seems to be totally unsubstantiated. Did you see any signal of transparency and accountability at Boeing so far? Any personal consquences? In my opinion this shows again a flaw of late-stage capitalism. No one in Boeings leadership gains anything from transparency or really "fixing" Boeing´s problems and culture. In the opposite, these steps would cost lots of money and would probably cost the current leadership their job (and bonus). This really is a principal/agent problem and a problem between (not-measureable) long-term goals and (financial) short-term rewards. From my point of view, its absolutely not understandable how Muilenberg still has his job. Even if the whole development happened before his time, at least the second crash is 100% his responsibility and there is no way a manager with his record would still be in charge in all other western countries (e.g. Europe or Japan).