4 ms·
“A slightly more grey area arises where, with no human involvement or instruction, a price-setting AI algorithm teaches itself to coordinate with competitors –
by goliatone 7y ago
“A slightly more grey area arises where, with no human involvement or instruction, a price-setting AI algorithm teaches itself to coordinate with competitors – otherwise referred to as tacit algorithmic collusion. While it is unclear the extent to which current AI technology allows for this tacit coordination, a 2018 University of Bologna study found that if two competitors both employ pricing algorithms, and each gives its software total autonomy to set prices, those two algorithms would reach collusive, price-fixing arrangements more often than not.”
[1] https://www.russellmcveagh.com/insights/march-2019/ai-and-price-fixing-collusion-by-machines https://www.russellmcveagh.com/insights/march-2019/ai-and-pr...
[2] https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3209781 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3209781
- TheSpiceIsLife 7y ago> no human involvement How does it come about that that is that a concept? Does the thought go something like: "We neglected to instruct the algorithm not to collude, and failed to monitor outcomes for collusion, therefore we're not responsible?" > and each gives its software total autonomy to set prices Ah, yep.
- Nasrudith 7y agoI think it is a matter of intention as the ultimate ass-covering. They never /intended/ anything other than a legal aim.