"He was banned from two (albeit popular) dating apps. There is no shortage of other dating apps and sites out there, including ones that cater specifically to a

"He was banned from two (albeit popular) dating apps. There is no shortage of other dating apps and sites out there, including ones that cater specifically to a 2nd Amendment-friendly crowd. A cursory search reveals "Concealed Carry Match", "Pro-Gun Dating", and "Date a Gun Lover", for example." Using this exact logic, should a website only allow people that are one race or sexual orientation..because there are 'plenty of alternatives'? What if a company decided to deny access based on the fact that they believed in Gay marriage? Many people agree with this only because they don't like the guy and don't care if he gets banned, but would most likely take legal action if it was something that hit too close to home. "So lets not go overboard here" This is just one example of a changing culture that is perfectly happy allowing companies to deny access to a subset of customers based on political ideology and personal vendettas. Twitter is a great example of this: It's pretty well-known that they regularly ban more right-leaning/conservative users and allow horrible users to continue to have accounts, because they don't want to upset the left-leaning mobs. You can tell those people to find another site..and they attempt to...until they are banned from their payment provider and hounded/kicked off every other site as well.