4 ms·
Right, X11 made it possible to have literally hundreds of window managers written to fit all possible tastes. With Wayland, the ecosystem of window managers wi
by sam_lowry_ 8y ago
Right, X11 made it possible to have literally hundreds of window managers written to fit all possible tastes.
With Wayland, the ecosystem of window managers will never be as rich, because a window manager has to implement too many things to be usable.
- floatboth 8y agoYou can always take a compositor and fork it to implement your window management features… or, much better, use a compositor with a plugin system, so window managers can become plugins! :) https://github.com/WayfireWM/wayfire https://github.com/WayfireWM/wayfire
- m463 8y ago> Right, X11 made it possible to have literally hundreds of window managers written to fit all possible tastes. I've used it since its inception, however it has always kind of sucked. I think it goes to it's basic philosophy: it did not enforce policy. This let it survive a long time. It was whatever people wanted it to be. But because of this flexibility, it never became great. It's like the old Lilly Tomlin skit - "I always wanted to be somebody, but now I realize I should have been more specific."
- nine_k 8y agoWhat has become great? E.g. has NeXT / macOS graphics system become great? (Yes, I dislike macOS for its lack of customizability and being opinionated. It may be great for someone, but not for me.)
- m463 8y agoFor toolkit consistency I think macos is one of the best. consistency = 1/customizability and I agree with you there, especially annoying for folks who know their way around a computer. For 3d acceleration windows seems to have the most advanced and high performance graphics that is in wide use.
- mycall 8y agoconsistency * customizability = 1