3 ms·
Verified? It was a he said, she said situation according to the New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/technology/google-sexual-harassment-andy-rub
by malvosenior 8y ago
Verified? It was a he said, she said situation according to the New York Times:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/technology/google-sexual-harassment-andy-rubin.html https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/technology/google-sexual-...
Regardless, if you are harassed, sue. If you don't like your company, quit. Causing a huge media uproar accomplishes nothing other than showing that you can't behave professionally.
The case we're talking about now is a great point. The two troublemakers aren't doing as well in their careers as they would like so what do they do? Go to sympathetic media companies looking for outrage bait and blame their lack of career progress and shifting roles on "retaliation".
I would not want to work with people like this and if I was their manager I would let them go.
- vkou 8y ago> Verified? It was sufficiently verified to get Andy fired. It clearly met the bar to be seen as a problem by the company. > Regardless, if you are harassed, sue. If you don't like your company, quit. Causing a huge media uproar accomplishes nothing other than showing that you can't behave professionally. It empowers other victims to speak out, employees to organize, and demand change. As a result of the walk-out, a number of positive changes took place inside Google. Your argument is an authoritarian one, that values the appearance of propriety and conformity more then actual propriety.