3 ms·

I think you got it kinda backwards, but due to confusing naming you wouldn’t be the first. It’s more like I’m logging into a remote server (using stuff like SS

I think you got it kinda backwards, but due to confusing naming you wouldn’t be the first. It’s more like I’m logging into a remote server (using stuff like SSH), starting applications there and getting the GUI up on my local desktop, like any other local window/app, due to X-forwarding (back to my Xorg server). It’s not perfect, but it sure is a lot more “natural” and integrated into your desktop than VNC or RDP. I hope we can keep something similar with Wayland (using maybe XWayland or other compatibility kludges). I think it’s pretty nice.

AnIdiotOnTheNet 8y ago
RDP has had remote app for a long time now, which is essentially the same thing: run program on remote machine, forward its window to local.
- mindcrime 8y ago
  Interesting, I've never heard of that facility before. I guess it wasn't promoted very heavily? Or maybe it's just because RDP comes from the MS world and I try very hard to avoid Windows and anything Windows-centric unless forced to. Anyway, thanks for sharing that. I'll look into it. Here's some info on RemoteApp for anybody else who's interested. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Enterprise-Mobility-Security/Introducing-RemoteApp-and-Desktop-Connections/ba-p/246803 https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Enterprise-Mobility-S... https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/2345.publish-a-remoteapp-application-on-remote-desktop-service.aspx https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/...
  - magicalhippo 8y ago
    > Or maybe it's just because RDP comes from the MS world and I try very hard to avoid Windows and anything Windows-centric unless forced to. It'll be due to that. For the most part it works really well, though still not flawless after all these years.
  - josteink 8y ago
    Thanks for the links! Reading those though, I’m kind of underwhelmed. You have to have a dedicated Windows Terminal Server installation (which I’m sure has expensive and complicated licensing), on that you have to “publish apps” (which seems like a process in itself), on the client you need to subscribe to feeds. And after about 100 such individual steps... magic. With X11 I just forward a socket, launch a normal program normally, and everything just works. That’s just so much simpler, so much easier to work with and easier to understand. I can do it casually, on demand, when I need it. No preparation needed. That Windows thing... looks expensive and something you which takes planning.
- DonHopkins 8y ago
  The Andrew Window Manager / Andrew User Interface System / Andrew User Environment supported remote display of windows on a workstation display before X-Windows, circa 1985. Andrew was used by lots of people at CMU where it was developed, and also externally. And a lot of the people who worked on Andrew also worked on X10, X11, NeWS, and even (much later) Java. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Project >Initially the system was prototyped on Sun Microsystems machines, and then to IBM RT PC series computers running a special IBM Academic Operating System. People involved in the project included James H. Morris, Nathaniel Borenstein, James Gosling, and David S. H. Rosenthal. >The Andrew Window Manager (WM), a tiled (non-overlapping windows) window system which allowed remote display of windows on a workstation display. It was one of the first network-oriented window managers to run on Unix as a graphical display. As part of the CMU's partnership with IBM, IBM retained the licensing rights to WM. WM was meant to be licensed under reasonable terms, which CMU thought would resemble a relatively cheap UNIX license, while IBM sought a more lucrative licensing scheme. WM was later replaced by X11 from MIT. Its developers, Gosling and Rosenthal, would next develop the NeWS (Network extensible Window System). Andrew died! Andrew is dead! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMuBIJxmnA&feature=youtu.be&t=2m49s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMuBIJxmnA&feature=youtu.be... How often mankind has wished for a world as peaceful and secure as the one Andrew provided.

AnIdiotOnTheNet 8y ago

RDP has had remote app for a long time now, which is essentially the same thing: run program on remote machine, forward its window to local.

mindcrime 8y ago
Interesting, I've never heard of that facility before. I guess it wasn't promoted very heavily? Or maybe it's just because RDP comes from the MS world and I try very hard to avoid Windows and anything Windows-centric unless forced to. Anyway, thanks for sharing that. I'll look into it. Here's some info on RemoteApp for anybody else who's interested. https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Enterprise-Mobility-Security/Introducing-RemoteApp-and-Desktop-Connections/ba-p/246803 https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/Enterprise-Mobility-S... https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/2345.publish-a-remoteapp-application-on-remote-desktop-service.aspx https://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/...
- magicalhippo 8y ago
  > Or maybe it's just because RDP comes from the MS world and I try very hard to avoid Windows and anything Windows-centric unless forced to. It'll be due to that. For the most part it works really well, though still not flawless after all these years.
- josteink 8y ago
  Thanks for the links! Reading those though, I’m kind of underwhelmed. You have to have a dedicated Windows Terminal Server installation (which I’m sure has expensive and complicated licensing), on that you have to “publish apps” (which seems like a process in itself), on the client you need to subscribe to feeds. And after about 100 such individual steps... magic. With X11 I just forward a socket, launch a normal program normally, and everything just works. That’s just so much simpler, so much easier to work with and easier to understand. I can do it casually, on demand, when I need it. No preparation needed. That Windows thing... looks expensive and something you which takes planning.
DonHopkins 8y ago
The Andrew Window Manager / Andrew User Interface System / Andrew User Environment supported remote display of windows on a workstation display before X-Windows, circa 1985. Andrew was used by lots of people at CMU where it was developed, and also externally. And a lot of the people who worked on Andrew also worked on X10, X11, NeWS, and even (much later) Java. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Project https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Project >Initially the system was prototyped on Sun Microsystems machines, and then to IBM RT PC series computers running a special IBM Academic Operating System. People involved in the project included James H. Morris, Nathaniel Borenstein, James Gosling, and David S. H. Rosenthal. >The Andrew Window Manager (WM), a tiled (non-overlapping windows) window system which allowed remote display of windows on a workstation display. It was one of the first network-oriented window managers to run on Unix as a graphical display. As part of the CMU's partnership with IBM, IBM retained the licensing rights to WM. WM was meant to be licensed under reasonable terms, which CMU thought would resemble a relatively cheap UNIX license, while IBM sought a more lucrative licensing scheme. WM was later replaced by X11 from MIT. Its developers, Gosling and Rosenthal, would next develop the NeWS (Network extensible Window System). Andrew died! Andrew is dead! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMuBIJxmnA&feature=youtu.be&t=2m49s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nZMuBIJxmnA&feature=youtu.be... How often mankind has wished for a world as peaceful and secure as the one Andrew provided.