7 ms·
Your argument strikes me as knee-jerk cynicism. Facebook wants to be around for a long time. Facebook wants people to get value out of their site. This isn't a
by moultano 16y ago
Your argument strikes me as knee-jerk cynicism.
Facebook wants to be around for a long time. Facebook wants people to get value out of their site. This isn't a get-rich-quick scheme where the objective is to strip-mine their users. A necessary condition for Facebook making any money is that people enjoy their service. If they don't implement it, it's because they don't think it'd be valuable to enough people to be worth the opportunity cost of having people implement it, not because they think it would hurt ad revenue.
It seems to be a popular sentiment that any ad-supported company hates their users, and I don't get it. It's true for spam but it isn't true for companies that want to be around for more than a year.
- chopsueyar 16y agoIf they really loved their users, and their users really loved them, it surely would not be hard to have an ad-free, monthly subscription service. Look at Angry Birds, why would they even want to sell paid apps anymore with the amount of revenue they can earn from advertising within the game?