3 ms·
I don't agree with your interpretation of the story. Apple associated the criminal's face with the victim's ID. The police arrested the victim. The victim's fa
by tomp 8y ago
I don't agree with your interpretation of the story.
Apple associated the criminal's face with the victim's ID. The police arrested the victim. The victim's face was never even in Apple's system! (If I read the article correctly.)
The exact same thing would happen if Apple hadn't used Face Recognition software at all.
- dpcx 8y agoThis is the thing I've been struggling with in everyone else's comments. From what the article suggests, the victim never even appeared in the Apple store, but the thief came back in at some point, so the police went to the address that Apple had on file for the thief. Why is this Apple's problem, beyond them associating a face to an ID _that was given to them_?