4 ms·
Right, two different things. I meant: 1) those results wouldn't be at odds with my results. 2) but I wonder if myWindoonn judges the paper they linked to be c
by viraghrr 7y ago
Right, two different things. I meant: 1) those results wouldn't be at odds with my results. 2) but I wonder if myWindoonn judges the paper they linked to be correct? (unflawed, complete etc - does it prove its titular claim?)
if the paper is flawed, nothing follows from it, there's no reason to spend time on it except to understand its flaws. Then it's just another crank paper, besides and unrelated to mine.