> You probably don't see the bias in the article because you support unionization. Erm, yeah, I'm not sure where to begin with this other than a "people in gla

> You probably don't see the bias in the article because you support unionization. Erm, yeah, I'm not sure where to begin with this other than a "people in glass houses" style comment. I don't support unionization, for at least a couple of reasons[1], yet I still can't see where you're coming from with these assertions. [1] I don't think either is relevant to this discussion.