2 ms·
I believe your argument is that, because the author of a NYT piece has the right to free speech, any law prohibiting the NYT from publishing that article is inv
by jml7c5 8y ago
I believe your argument is that, because the author of a NYT piece has the right to free speech, any law prohibiting the NYT from publishing that article is invalid. Not because the NYT has a right to free speech, but because one can "fall back" on the protection afforded to the original author.
Doesn't this same protection apply to the author of an advertisement published by a super PAC?
- cf498 8y agoThe NYT shouldnt need to be involved in the discussion, they are simply making the free speech of an author available to more people. A bit more complicated megaphone. Someone working for a super PAC how ever isnt spending his own money.