3 ms·
There are two very distinct statements which say entirely different things: "markets are probably not efficient" is a fine statement and I agree with it easily.
by TheDong 8y ago
There are two very distinct statements which say entirely different things: "markets are probably not efficient" is a fine statement and I agree with it easily.
"Markets are provably not efficient because xyz" is much harder to agree with, especially given that paper, since it's the same as saying you've actually proven that P!=NP and thus requires an extraordinary proof.
You're claiming to have a solid proof. Just because someone agrees that your result is likely correct, that doesn't mean they agree with your proof.
- viraghrr 8y agoRight, two different things. I meant: 1) those results wouldn't be at odds with my results. 2) but I wonder if myWindoonn judges the paper they linked to be correct? (unflawed, complete etc - does it prove its titular claim?) if the paper is flawed, nothing follows from it, there's no reason to spend time on it except to understand its flaws. Then it's just another crank paper, besides and unrelated to mine.