Cloning someone's documentation is not "cloning our product" Using the Wayback machine, I looked at both company's docs and the navigation isn't the same - htt

Cloning someone's documentation is not "cloning our product" Using the Wayback machine, I looked at both company's docs and the navigation isn't the same - https://twitter.com/CaseySoftware/status/1120521768723255297 https://twitter.com/CaseySoftware/status/1120521768723255297 - so even the copy/paste job looks like a single page. Yes, it's absolutely poor form and may be a copyright violation but the screencaps cover OAuth 2.0, therefore everything - yes, including the parameter names - MUST be the same, according to the spec. Without more evidence, this is a nothing burger.