4 ms·
If Peterson is not of your like, you could still take a look at some of the papers and studies referenced in the article from credible sources[1][2], before dra
by randiantech 7y ago
If Peterson is not of your like, you could still take a look at some of the papers and studies referenced in the article from credible sources[1][2], before drawing conclusions from an unrelated subject (whether or not he read the Communist Manifesto).
[1] http://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6412/eaas9899 http://science.sciencemag.org/content/362/6412/eaas9899
[2] https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886917305962?via%3Dihub https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S019188691...
- tomlock 7y agoConsidering that academic rigour is at stake - given we need to trust he's made a rigorous survey of the academic consensus surrounding this topic - it is a very related subject. Given that none of these papers prove that women are better or worse at programming than men, perhaps you can demonstrate your academic rigour to me, too?