This has already been flagged, but a few points for those who may stumble upon it: the author is a professor at a wingnut, for-profit Christian college that pri

This has already been flagged, but a few points for those who may stumble upon it: the author is a professor at a wingnut, for-profit Christian college that primarily grants online, non-accredited certificates. So when he writes, > The substantive problem is the bias Rosenblatt brings to her story of liberalism. we need to look at the other possibility: Rosenblatt is dismantling the tradition, central to the author's personal mythology, of liberalism in the Anglo world being the primary thread of that idea. The book he quotes to claim that it is not so is another piece by a professor at Hillsdale College. When you go look at the work they have produced, it becomes pretty clear. Rosenblatt has been working on this issue for a long time, and has a paper trail to show it. If you look at Schleuter's CV, you a minor PhD dissertation on Martin Luther King and...that's about it.