3 ms·
I would say the breaking point has already been reached. There are heaps of better places to live with a vastly lower costs. All we need to do is convince the V
by danieltillett 8y ago
I would say the breaking point has already been reached. There are heaps of better places to live with a vastly lower costs. All we need to do is convince the VCs to fund startups in these places and we can all forget about SF.
- davidw 8y ago> All we need to do is convince the VCs to fund startups in these places and we can all forget about SF And you need to make sure there's a big talent pool there, and good universities. A few places are close to that, but it's not so easy to replicate. This book talks about it some: https://amzn.to/2XAU3f0 https://amzn.to/2XAU3f0 And most of the places that are close have rampant NIMBYism problems of their own.
- fmajid 8y agoIf anything, talent is getting more concentrated. The Boston region has lost a lot of its tech companies, for instance.
- njepa 8y agoThe problem is very few of them are better enough to be an advantage. Almost all of them have similar problem just at lesser scales, which means they can't handle much of a change. The things with place like SFBA and NYC is that as bad as they are you know what you get.