4 ms·

>many times better than any competing existing hardware Except that it isn't. NVIDA's Drive AGX Pegasus delivers 320 TOPS: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/

>many times better than any competing existing hardware Except that it isn't. NVIDA's Drive AGX Pegasus delivers 320 TOPS: https://www.marketwatch.com/story/nvidia-says-tesla-inaccurate-in-self-driving-comparison-2019-04-22?mod=technology https://www.marketwatch.com/story/nvidia-says-tesla-inaccura... Of course, nobody inside the Musk Reality Distortion Field actually cares about this.

invisible 8y ago
Not that I'm confident about either side of this, but the TOPS isn't the only important factor here. It's also the efficiency. If Tesla's CPU can do more ops/watt, then it's more ideal for the conditions that Tesla needs the CPU to fulfill. On top of that, I have no idea what "320 TOPS" means in the context of the specific workload Tesla has. Will they _actually_ get 320 TOPS?