>The best parts of rust's error handling are the try!() macro (aka `?`), Go's way of providing try!() macro is less magical but almost as useful.[1] > From/In

>The best parts of rust's error handling are the try!() macro (aka `?`), Go's way of providing try!() macro is less magical but almost as useful.[1] > From/Into error types allow the compiler to wrap types or convert between error types error is an interface in Go which can be easily cast/checked for the underlying type. > Go's error handling is pretty primitive I wouldn't call it primitive, I would call it simple. I like the comparison i read on a blog on HN. Rust is the 'new' C++ and Go is the new C [1] https://blog.golang.org/errors-are-values https://blog.golang.org/errors-are-values