2 ms·
That is also against the law. From https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/retaliation.cfm https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/retaliation.cfm > For example, depending on
by Jasper_ 8y ago
That is also against the law. From https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/retaliation.cfm https://www.eeoc.gov/laws/types/retaliation.cfm
> For example, depending on the facts, it could be retaliation if an employer acts because of the employee's EEO activity to:
> * transfer the employee to a less desirable position;
- malcolmgreaves 8y agoThank goodness for the labor movement.
- kolbe 8y agoThe problem with that, like so many laws, is that you have to prove motive for the law to work. I'm sure the previous commenter is not so naive as to think companies give a formal, written demotion stating that their EEO activity was the reason.
- perfmode 8y agoNot anymore you don’t. It’s easy nowadays to conceal motive through indirection.