3 ms·
I believe calling it a game and using those analogies trivializes the ethical implication of some of your views. And while I definitely don't think "all human
by ghostbrainalpha 7y ago
I believe calling it a game and using those analogies trivializes the ethical implication of some of your views. And while I definitely don't think "all human beings are playing equally for the interest of all others", I do think if the "ruling consensus" elects to share power with a more diverse group of people that would be in the greater interest of humanity in the long term.
- cerealbad 7y agoPower diffusion leads to asymmetric instability (and inverse). It is dangerous to assume non relativistic ethics in a pluralist world. Conflict will happen in a persons head when holding oppositions simultaneously or inevitably between persons opposing heads simultaneously. Self interest is true, self negating and both.