3 ms·
They failed because they were not able to adapt to the Chinese market/have any competitive advantage against alibaba or JD which is the point the article is try
by fantasticsid 7y ago
They failed because they were not able to adapt to the Chinese market/have any competitive advantage against alibaba or JD which is the point the article is trying to make. None of what you mentioned is alluded in the article.
- atomical 7y agoWell, then, I guess the author of the comment must disagree with the article.
- product50 7y agoOr maybe pandaily was scared to say anything against China. Honestly, the fact that there was no talk about regulation in that article is a huge red flag. Why would China allow international companies to play in their turf when they eComm can generate 100s of billions of dollars of value for local companies (as it has)?
- cletus 7y agoMy contention is that wouldn't matter. If they did adapt to the Chinese market and seriously started to eat market share from the likes of Alibaba I GUARANTEE you the rules would change to Amazon's disadvantage.
- throwaway44562 7y agoNah, I doubt it. Just look at how successful Apple and Microsoft are in China. Other brands too. You don’t see the government changing the laws so Li-Ning can beat Nike.
- EduardoBautista 7y agoApple and Microsoft both have products that don't have any Chinese equal. Competing with macOS or Windows is probably the hardest thing to do in the software world at the moment.