5 ms·
I agree with the thrust of your comment, I think I just didn’t frame it properly. The comment I was responding to seemed (to me) to suggest that we go back to t
by patentatt 8y ago
I agree with the thrust of your comment, I think I just didn’t frame it properly. The comment I was responding to seemed (to me) to suggest that we go back to the 1950s when a woman didn’t have a right as a matter of law or de facto to have a career and aspirations of her own. I read the comment as suggesting that women’s empowerment was a proximate cause to the degradation of the family. I think electing to be a parent is not “devaluing” (as I myself, as a father, have done so) but that removing the option and making the decision for all women is devaluing. Not sure I track the comment re: swipe against traditional families? If I suggested that then I was inarticulate or misinterpreted.
Edit: also to the gp comment, which suggests that women are ‘naturally’ better at parenting. Fuck all that, I’m a kickass dad, I’ll go toe to toe any day with any mother.
- LMYahooTFY 8y agoHow does the GP comment suggest that? It's not clear to me. It seemed to suggest that there are complementary roles that cannot be completely subsumed by either individually.
- patentatt 8y agoThe undertone is that women are better at being parents than men. I don’t agree with that.
- LMYahooTFY 8y agoCan you elaborate and explain how this "undertone" is present? How do you see the GP comparing two mutually exclusive roles in child rearing?