Generally, yes. About all as racist and trying to take advantage of others. I read the article, and I liked it. But I chuckle when the authors says "We have r

Generally, yes. About all as racist and trying to take advantage of others. I read the article, and I liked it. But I chuckle when the authors says "We have reclaimed that word as our own. We can use it, and white people no longer can" Maybe this rules apply in polite company? I don't are about polite company. I have been called too many bad names. I can use any word I want - including nigger, when appropriate, like in that story. Sorry to people who don't like that and want to impose me things just because of my looks. Because growing more taboos words, trying to retract in pocket of self preserving culture while crying cultural appropriation is wrong. I did that. The author also. I just hope our kids won't have to leave with that, can fix their DNA any way they want (the transgendered, wouldn't you like that too?) and integrate in any way their want once the human race will have taken grown out of these stupidities and realized we are all in the same boat. DNA doesn't matter much. How people treat you because of your DNA on which you have no control, that matters to me. Funny thought: I really think we will become capable of altering appearance and DNA way before we grow up to become more accepting to people "not like us" and "minorities".