5 ms·
Yeah Reagent is definitely the most productive front-end development flow. Just having hiccup vs JSX is a huge win. With JSX I spend most of my time chasing dow
by bgorman 8y ago
Yeah Reagent is definitely the most productive front-end development flow. Just having hiccup vs JSX is a huge win. With JSX I spend most of my time chasing down syntax errors. With Hiccup I can simply use my IDE to navigate the code and syntax errors almost never occur and when they do it is obvious. Not to mention Hiccup is much more concise and can be read by macros.
Clojurescript truly is alien technology. Modern react has basically adopted Reagent's programming style with Hooks. Clojurescript/Reagent were 5 years ahead of the curve, truly amazing.
Clojurescript gives you a live repl, immutable data by default, core.async, macros, and an amazing consistent core library. None of these things are ever going to come to the javascript world
- theptip 8y agoI had only heard (from afar) about Om; how does Reagent compare?
- vnorilo 8y agoReagent is a simpler abstraction around React, almost like a director's cut :) Om is a bit more oriented to react components. Both are mighty fine. http://theatticlight.net/posts/Om-and-Reagent/ http://theatticlight.net/posts/Om-and-Reagent/