3 ms·
we could call searx[1] a decentralized alternative to google or ddg etcetera. in fact it is an aggregate or meta-search that sends proxy requests to user-selec
by nydel 7y ago
we could call searx[1] a decentralized alternative to google or ddg etcetera.
in fact it is an aggregate or meta-search that sends proxy requests to user-selected search engines (with defaults varying from instance to instance).
a list of instances[2] is available via the source git repository. i would recommend a few[3] myself.
as of yet searx does not do some things we might want done:
a) original indexing
b) federation between cooperative instances
c) offer a spec for archiving data[4]
i think we'll get to something like this soon. there are a lot of pieces in play and it falls to all of us - users, hackers, developers - to participate in development, curate adjoining projects, donate time to test & halcyon & on & on.
as always, it will be interesting to see what we all come up with.
[01.0] https://asciimoo.github.io/searx/ https://asciimoo.github.io/searx/
[01.1] searx is copylefted floss via GNU Affero GPL3
[02.0] https://stats.searx.xyz/ https://stats.searx.xyz/
[03.0] https://search.disroot.org/ https://search.disroot.org/
[03.1] this organization respect's EFF's Do Not Track
[03.5] https://searx.prvcy.eu https://searx.prvcy.eu
[03.6] a secondary useful for reasons indicated by the URI
[04.0] this is where the submitted comes into play. e.g.
[04.0] should we develop some sort of open API for domains
[04.0] to request archiving? this could take multiple forms
[04.0] as a project but as long as it's floss and has RFC...