3 ms·
Except that Ember is one of the heaviest front-end frameworks in terms of file size. Heavy file-size = more work for your mobile phone's CPU to deal with.
by cutler 8y ago
Except that Ember is one of the heaviest front-end frameworks in terms of file size. Heavy file-size = more work for your mobile phone's CPU to deal with.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- vmware513 8y agoIt changed a lot and you don't have to use all the feature if you don't need it. React with data support, router, etc can be super big... and latest Ember without Ember Data and tree shaking is small, so you win a lot of developer time and money and you end up with a well maintainable code, which can be understand by others in the first day, because of conventions over configurations. ;) IMHO Ember.js is still the best option for frontend, especially if you build a serious Web Application.
- geezerjay 8y ago> Except that Ember is one of the heaviest front-end frameworks in terms of file size. IIRC react requires nearly 300MB worth of npm packages just to get the hello world example to run. How does Ember fare in comparison?
- asutekku 8y agoNPM packages generally have nothing to do with the size of the built website. I don’t care if I need around 300mb of npm packages to build a 10kb website when ember itself is bigger.