That is an interesting article. There are certainly lots of reasons for thinking that the behavior of the participants was much more complicated than is sometim

That is an interesting article. There are certainly lots of reasons for thinking that the behavior of the participants was much more complicated than is sometimes presented, but nevertheless, it seems not beyond possibility that, when questioned after the event, participants might have made somewhat self-serving statements about actions of theirs that they may have had qualms about at the time. I find it interesting that the article makes an issue over the point that "the majority do not appear to have continued out of commitment to science," as this particular motivation seems to me to be one of the lesser issues raised by the exercise.