If presented in the context of a substantive comment about the assertions, I'd agree with you. Without any such substantive comments it's simply assuming the wo

If presented in the context of a substantive comment about the assertions, I'd agree with you. Without any such substantive comments it's simply assuming the worst about others. The HN guidelines [0] are actually pretty darn good guidance for encouraging intelligent discussion of complex topics, and by my read advocate for more thoughtful approaches to commenting on multiple fronts here, including not posting shallow dismissals or assumptions about astroturfing and shillage. Again, if there is a concrete objection to the logic the author took time to detail in their post, by all means that's a great topic for discussion, and that's where we would all actually learn something positive instead of just insinuating something negative. [0] https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html