4 ms·

I don’t understand your kvetching here. You’re mad because the victim hasn’t done enough in your mind to write the details for the public? Why not presume that

by danso 8y ago

I don’t understand your kvetching here. You’re mad because the victim hasn’t done enough in your mind to write the details for the public? Why not presume that she was clear in her complaint, given that Datacamp has already decided to apologize? And why should she have to give a statement about wanting the executive to get fired? The submitted post says explicitly that is not what they want. > It did not threaten to go public or call for the executive’s firing, but it did bring up how the growing rumors and uncertainty around misconduct at DataCamp have been a problem for the personal reputations of instructors.

hjk05 8y ago
Let’s be clear. I’m not saying that she has to give a statement, but if your a third party writing a blogpost about a case where the victim has come forwards, you could state that. You could even ask the victim what she thinks, and just state so if the victim doesn’t want to comment. What I’m saying is that it’s confusing that everyone involved is being vague even about public facts. Even you are confused as you’re linking the statement from someone who isn’t the victim presenting it as though it was from the victim. What I’m saying is really just that everything seems very confusing. It feels like the whole affair would benefit from someone involved just coming forward and honestly reporting what they feel or what they know or didn’t know happened or what they want to happen. As it is I’m none the wiser, but since I both use, love and often recommend DataCamp, I am extremely keen on hearing if the leadership engaged in something that I cannot support in which case I will definately look for alternatives. I’m currently hearing a lot og posts saying “trust me something happened either in the incident or the response to it that should make you not want to support them.... can’t tell you what but trust me”. And I really just want to know some of the facts of the matter instead of just vague hints that “stuff definately happened”.

by danso 8y ago

hjk05 8y ago

Let’s be clear. I’m not saying that she has to give a statement, but if your a third party writing a blogpost about a case where the victim has come forwards, you could state that. You could even ask the victim what she thinks, and just state so if the victim doesn’t want to comment. What I’m saying is that it’s confusing that everyone involved is being vague even about public facts. Even you are confused as you’re linking the statement from someone who isn’t the victim presenting it as though it was from the victim. What I’m saying is really just that everything seems very confusing. It feels like the whole affair would benefit from someone involved just coming forward and honestly reporting what they feel or what they know or didn’t know happened or what they want to happen. As it is I’m none the wiser, but since I both use, love and often recommend DataCamp, I am extremely keen on hearing if the leadership engaged in something that I cannot support in which case I will definately look for alternatives. I’m currently hearing a lot og posts saying “trust me something happened either in the incident or the response to it that should make you not want to support them.... can’t tell you what but trust me”. And I really just want to know some of the facts of the matter instead of just vague hints that “stuff definately happened”.