3 ms·
No, only to reduce individual choice when it's clearly pushing away from significantly better global optima than individual choice can achieve.
by AlexCoventry 8y ago
No, only to reduce individual choice when it's clearly pushing away from significantly better global optima than individual choice can achieve.
- Drakim 8y agoFor example, while an individual might benefit from stealing, but hurts overall more than it helps, so we try to block that individual choice despite the fact that we might be hurting somebody who is really good at stealing.