Yes, but that’s not being realistic. 1% of 1 million people is 10,000 people, who will be roughly half kids and young adults — the heirs. So you’re talking 0.

Yes, but that’s not being realistic. 1% of 1 million people is 10,000 people, who will be roughly half kids and young adults — the heirs. So you’re talking 0.00008% of the wealth being passed down, roughly. That’s still pretty unequal in a society with a lot of people, but I’m also not sure smashing any granule of accumulated wealth leads to a vibrant society — the inter generational transfer of structures is essential for culture. Capitalism is fundamentally just highly mobile aristocracy, though — and that may be the best we can do.