4 ms·

I would imagine the federal government has enough transparency and process regarding pay scales to make this moot.

• CapricornNoble 7y ago
  Lemme clarify: your application FOR a Federal position is expected to include your PREVIOUS salaries, regardless of whether they were public or private sector. So if you are a California resident and you submit an application for a Federal position in California, but you don't disclose your previous salaries, I wonder if they consider your application incomplete? If that was used as justification for rejecting your application, would you have grounds to dispute that rejection legally?
  • SllX 7y ago
    That’s easy: California has no jurisdiction over the Feds. The Federal Government isn’t a private employer subject to California labor laws and regulations.
  • Fjolsvith 7y ago
    I believe that by applying for a federal job, you are agreeing to federal jurisdiction.
  • bumby 7y ago
    First off, you'll almost never get an indication of why your resume was rejected. Secondly, as someone already commented, federal positions don't have tho play by state rules. They do sometimes even ask for pay stubs to prove salaries claimed
  • dannypgh 7y ago
    I'm saying, the reason the restriction is present on private employers is so they don't make a low offer to someone who had been paid less before. My understanding of federal employment is that the pay scales are published and public record, and job postings state which scale it's on. This level of disclosure seems to minimize the possible harm here, as there's far less room for negotiation for anyone.