8 ms·
Sounds similar to web browsers coming with their own CA certificates instead of using system-wide ones, leading to poor integration and inconsistencies. Though
by defanor 8y ago
Sounds similar to web browsers coming with their own CA certificates instead of using system-wide ones, leading to poor integration and inconsistencies. Though a centralized database of rules for websites sounds awkward on its own.
- tialaramex 8y ago> Sounds similar to web browsers coming with their own CA certificates instead of using system-wide ones, leading to poor integration and inconsistencies. Well, the only notable browser which does this is Mozilla's Firefox, and not coincidentally the only root trust store where you can actually see how the sausage is made is Mozilla's. All the other big trust stores (Apple, Microsoft, Google) are black boxes. Presumably they have one or more employees dedicated to this stuff, but since we're not shown their working it might equally be the product of an intern throwing darts at a list. Right now for example Mozilla is discussing Certinomis, a small CA which doesn't seem to be very good at the technical aspects of their job, issuing certificates for DNS names with spaces in them, typo'ing dates, filling parameters out incorrectly, nothing that screams "evil" but certainly more clumsy than we'd prefer. Are other trust stores thinking about Certinomis? You'll only find out if one of them announces a change.