I'm not sure it is a a shortcoming though. It's an entirely defensible proposition that under some circumstances, accuracy and reply speed is inversely correlat

I'm not sure it is a a shortcoming though. It's an entirely defensible proposition that under some circumstances, accuracy and reply speed is inversely correlated with intelligence. Consider: you ask two colleagues a deep and subtle yes/no question. One immediately replies 'nah'. The other thinks for a long time and then finally replies "I don't think so, but I'm not totally sure..." Which of your colleagues has demonstrated greater intelligence?