4 ms·
> Very typical of engineers who just want to pad their resume at the expense of unsuspecting business people. Or they were given the same PR crap you always ge
by chrismeller 8y ago
> Very typical of engineers who just want to pad their resume at the expense of unsuspecting business people.
Or they were given the same PR crap you always get from sales people that they’re just days away from tripling the number of clients and by next year they should be 10-20x the number, so they went ahead and “built it right” so they wouldn’t run into the inevitable scaling issues they were supposedly assured to hit in short order?
- hobofan 8y agoA simple architecture should be able to carry this to 10x and even to 100x if you really want to push it.
- chrismeller 8y agoAnd I’m not really saying otherwise, though I would somewhat disagree. I’m just saying that they weren’t necessarily (or even likely) thieving contractors who were just looking out for themselves. They built a respectable, usable, system. Honestly the contractors I see in IT are usually the far opposite end: it works well enough that they’re happy and pay my bill and by the time it doesn’t work anymore I’ll be off to another gig, so who cares?
- playing_colours 8y agoIn many cases, the cause of the problem may not be contractors. There are lots of clients that clearly set their expectations for contractors who they see as expensive necessary evil: they want you to deliver fast and now, they do not want to hear that bubble that it will take longer to deliver a robust system.
- remilouf 8y agoIn this case no one technically competent was here to manage them. There were no expectations.