4 ms·
I do not see why the rest of the country needs to pay for this. I can understand why Holland has to resort to this sort of civil engineering, otherwise their co
by doggydogs94 8y ago
I do not see why the rest of the country needs to pay for this. I can understand why Holland has to resort to this sort of civil engineering, otherwise their country would cease to exist. For the US, keeping New Orleans afloat is just an unnecessary expense.
- mises 8y agoYes, much of it is below sea level and stupidly expensive to quite literally keep afloat. It's quite the expense, and it's probably best to move. It's not the job of the feds to take money from one state to cover the expenses of another.