3 ms·
Its not very easy to redesign the 737. Bigger Engines need more clearance. More clearance requires longer landing gear. Longer landing gear requires a wider pla
by blackflame7000 8y ago
Its not very easy to redesign the 737. Bigger Engines need more clearance. More clearance requires longer landing gear. Longer landing gear requires a wider plane to fold up into. A wider plane is less fuel efficient and needs bigger engines and suddenly you are a 757,767,787, or 777
- pm24601 8y ago> Its not very easy to redesign the 737. Too bad. I know I am now permanently reluctant to fly 737s
- blackflame7000 8y agoYou really shouldn't be. There is a lot of misconception going around that the 737 is inherently unstable. This is not true. The 737-600/700/800/900 was one of the safest designs ever built (http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm http://www.airsafe.com/events/models/rate_mod.htm). Yet of the few crashes it had, a surprising amount was from pilot disorientation causing them to accidentally stall the plane. MCAS is not a feature to correct an unstable aircraft, it's to correct a confused pilot. MCAS is triggered if the following circumstances are right: 1) The airspeed is near stalling speed (takeoffs and landings) 2) The AOA (as reported by both sensors now) is greater than the aircraft can climb. The problem was that 1) the AOA data was faulty, 2) it did not check if there was a disagreement with the backup system 3) The aircraft failed to reset each time it took corrective measures such that each the correction was compounded. 4) the corrective action was 3 times more than approved. All of these things have been fixed but it also shows how many things have to go wrong for something to be catastrophic. But the max has been built on a solid foundation and that's much better than having to start from scratch.