3 ms·
The iPhone 3G is pretty much the archetype for all modern smartphones, but it's still not a pleasant experience by modern standards. Contra the "firmware bloat
by jdietrich 8y ago
The iPhone 3G is pretty much the archetype for all modern smartphones, but it's still not a pleasant experience by modern standards.
Contra the "firmware bloat is deliberately making old devices useless" argument, a 3GS on the original firmware is miserably sluggish and laggy. With modern eyes, you become painfully aware of how Apple used animated UI transitions to disguise a fundamentally very slow device. The original iOS 3.0 firmware is also strikingly primitive - at launch, the exciting new feature was copy and paste.
3G connectivity is woefully, miserably slow when you're used to 4G. A 480x320 LCD is visibly pixelated, even when it's only 3.5". It feels like peering through a broken telescope. There's no front-facing camera, the main camera is terrible, the battery life is atrocious even with a new battery, the GPS receiver takes an eternity to get a location fix.
Try one out for ten minutes, try out the cheapest of contemporary Chinese smartphones and I guarantee that you'd prefer to keep the no-name Android phone.
- icedchai 8y agoYes, this is all true... but at the time, it was still amazing! The comparison was not an Android phone, but a flip phone that could barely connect to the web... It was like night and day.
- perl4ever 8y agoI remember years ago running the original MacPaint, ultra-optimized for the 8MHz 68000, on a Macintosh SE/30, and thinking "this is why the 68030 was considered a mainframe on a chip when it came out" even though at the time the 68030 was generally considered old and slow. It all depends on exactly what software you're running on what hardware.