It means exactly what the license allows. Mostly proprietary seems a lot better than totally proprietary in the absence of open source alternatives. It’s bizar

It means exactly what the license allows. Mostly proprietary seems a lot better than totally proprietary in the absence of open source alternatives. It’s bizarre to me when people complain about things like “tivoization” or “open core”. These are by design or they are solved problems if the creators care for the trade offs. That is the Mozilla community’s issue. They chose the licensing. They have revised the strategy a number of times. I remember when code was tri-licensed. Or it’s also a consumers issue. Money talks.