> For a start, there is no evidence that the ones you are calling "not quite so actual" are any less actual than the one we share an experience of. Well, there

> For a start, there is no evidence that the ones you are calling "not quite so actual" are any less actual than the one we share an experience of. Well, there is evidence of the one I'm calling "actual" - if it's evidence you want, there's no evidence at all of the "not so actual" ones - citing the MW interpretation as evidence of these is purely circular. Regards not explaining perceived consciousness.. If MW is shunting off questions of actuality into something to be resolved by a theory of consciousness isn't it leaving behind centuries of consensus belief in the objective observer-independent existence of a physical world ontologically prior to consciousness?