4 ms·
> If believing that every citizen's vote should be of equal weight is wrong, I don't want to be right. Ok, so let me suggest that it is a problem if the cities
by Ntrails 8y ago
> If believing that every citizen's vote should be of equal weight is wrong, I don't want to be right.
Ok, so let me suggest that it is a problem if the cities have complete control over the course of policy. In principle pure majority is obviously just, but i don't think it is without consequence. Especially in the UK where London has all the money _and_ a-lot of the votes - i think it is worth some consideration?
- iron0013 8y agoYou know, you're right, the principle that every person should have equal political weight is absurd. As you say, minorities should be given more political voice than the majority. That's why I believe black people's votes should count double those of white people. I'm sure you'd agree with that, right?
- Ntrails 8y agoThere is a phrase "tyranny of the majority" designed for this specific purpose. Taking the argument to its logical conclusion, sure. I want representation in government for minorities who don't have the population to justify it. How to do that is interesting :)
- mullingitover 8y ago> Ok, so let me suggest that it is a problem if the cities have complete control over the course of policy. The cities are the economic engines of the country. Why should the underperforming rural areas be given an oversized voice in national government?