>But we don’t need to “regulate AI.” As we’ve seen, “artificial intelligence” is mostly a constructed catch-all term for lots of different types of technology

>But we don’t need to “regulate AI.” As we’ve seen, “artificial intelligence” is mostly a constructed catch-all term for lots of different types of technology The author forgets here that AI is not static. It’s a moving target. The examples of AI that exist today may be easy to brush off, but let’s not assume that extends to examples of AI in the future. In the meantime it is super annoying that simple techniques get marketed as “AI”.