4 ms·
My recollection is that 3x3 is a goal to be 3x faster than Ruby 2.0–presumably many of those gains have already been realized, so best not to depend on tripling
by Arubis 8y ago
My recollection is that 3x3 is a goal to be 3x faster than Ruby 2.0–presumably many of those gains have already been realized, so best not to depend on tripling _current_ performance.
- jamie_ca 8y agoYeah, the NES emulator that's one of the benchmarks is about 1.8x faster so far, so only another 1.6x to go on top of that.