3 ms·
I'm probably reading this wrong, but it sounds like police would be barred from e.g. looking at a public FB profile. That would go way to far IMHO. The police s
by rocqua 8y ago
I'm probably reading this wrong, but it sounds like police would be barred from e.g. looking at a public FB profile.
That would go way to far IMHO. The police should be able to view simple public information.
In my opinion (and hopefully, this is what the law means) the warrant should be needed whenever the police need to compel a third party to hand over information.
So, viewing a public FB profile is okay, but demanding FB to show the private profile would require a warrant.
- iNate2000 8y agoLooks like section 2... on page 5 of the PDF it lists some warrant exclusions: (v) if the owner has voluntarily and publicly disclosed the location information[.]; or (vi) from the remote computing service provider if the remote computing service provider voluntarily discloses the location information... https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/hbillenr/HB0057.pdf https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/hbillenr/HB0057.pdf