13 ms·
Your first sentence is a logical fallacy (your second clause does not follow from the first) and casually introduces the topic of intentional murder and genocid
by spaceheretostay 7y ago
Your first sentence is a logical fallacy (your second clause does not follow from the first) and casually introduces the topic of intentional murder and genocide of billions of people. You're the first to bring that suggestion up, but you attribute the idea to non-existent 'others'. Your next sentence is also a logical fallacy and AFAIK is simply untrue: "almost every...decentralizing the west"? I've never heard of any such proposals. This is no way to have any kind of reasonable discussion.
- mirimir 7y agoWilliam S. Burroughs satirized that approach in several of his novels. What I find is this, however: https://books.google.de/books?id=rbJvbXXvYUgC&pg=PT94&lpg=PT94&dq=burroughs+peasant+assholes+into+the+sea&source=bl&ots=eQRwiqhn59&sig=ACfU3U1web3td87DoESoHWABk7dsrgLehQ&hl=de&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwijk_65m9vhAhWJC-wKHetECngQ6AEwAHoECAgQAQ#v=onepage&q=burroughs%20peasant%20assholes%20into%20the%20sea&f=false https://books.google.de/books?id=rbJvbXXvYUgC&pg=PT94&lpg=PT... > Horn mentions The Club of Rome as a big player in the global conspiracy game. They are heavy into cutting down population. > Me too, before they breed their peasant assholes into the sea.