3 ms·
> More data is needed, unfortunately. I’ve slowly been convinced that more data isn’t needed before we act on this. The only reason there’s a call for more dat
by mathgeek 8y ago
> More data is needed, unfortunately.
I’ve slowly been convinced that more data isn’t needed before we act on this. The only reason there’s a call for more data is that these sports are very popular and drive revenue. We have enough data to say “yes, these sports pose a serious risk to the health of those playing them.” That doesn’t mean to have to stop playing them, but it does mean we can’t throw our hands up and claim we just don’t know why these kids keep getting brain injuries.
- jeffchien 8y agoAgreed. I can't help but think that some calls for more data is just intentionally delaying doing the right thing. Will any amount of data ever satisfy diehard fans and those who financially benefit from college football? Great talk about this very point: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWaPXzTDEDw https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWaPXzTDEDw
- jrandm 8y agoI think most programs admit and accept the physical risks of physical sports. Brain trauma is less understood than something like a knee injury, but that's exactly why these studies need to continue to gather data. We can continue to improve safety during play, detection of damage, and treatment after injury. Anecdotally, most youth leagues I see for contact sports have changed their rules to better protect the players. I would be against any legislation doing the same for adults who are informed of the risk. What other actions would you propose?