3 ms·
If you actually dive down into the study by Charles Schwab that this article is taking their numbers from, it doesn't look unreasonable at all. $1.1 million dol
by vichu 7y ago
If you actually dive down into the study by Charles Schwab that this article is taking their numbers from, it doesn't look unreasonable at all. $1.1 million dollars is the figure stated to be financially comfortable in San Francisco and the exact same number that was polled for New York City. It is approximately double the $540,000 average response from Charlotte, North Carolina. It's also definitely worth noting that this is net worth. If you have paid equity into a home, have other savings, own a car etc. you'll likely be hitting this number living in the Bay Area - this would easily fall into my personal definition of financially comfortable. I would go on to say that this number is likely only double that of somewhere like Charlotte because of real estate costs.
As for the quotes from financial planners... In my experience, they have no idea about the finances of a normal American and deal exclusively with farfetched wealthy individuals. One of my friends in Seattle making $200,000+ was told he could never afford to retire on such a meagre salary by one of these financial planners (note: he was referred to this financial planner by their father who happens to be quite wealthy).
- human20190310 7y ago"$1.1 million dollars is the figure stated... you'll likely be hitting this number living in the Bay Area" This is only true for certain values of "you", unless we all start paying $40 for a couple of donuts.
- vichu 7y agoI'm unsure as to what counterpoint you are trying to make. If you were implying that I thought anyone could manage to be financially comfortable in the Bay Area, that is patently false. To respond your apparent reading of my comment, the "you" that you appear to be referring to is an example of a person who is financially comfortable in the Bay Area and why that would amount to a net worth of approximately $1.1 million.
- human20190310 7y agoI understood your original point to mean that the $1.1M figure is not unreasonable, because it is correct. My counterpoint is that it is unreasonable in spite of being correct, because that number represents how much a family starting from zero needs to make to reach financial "comfort" in the area.